« Both Tagged AND Z-Listed... | Main | Some Clients Don't Want You to "Give the Answer" »

December 30, 2006

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451dc2e69e200d83431bad953ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Resolve to Improve Profitability:

» Considering Trying Something New In Your Practice for 2007? from Legal Ease Blog
Welcome to 2007! With the holidays and myriad end of year responsibilities, the past two weeks have disappeared without any posts. But other bloggers have been busy posting on some topics that will be important in 2007. Here are just [Read More]

» Why Is the Illinois Bar Advising Lawyers to Look Stupid By Admitting That They Can't Estimate Fees? from My Shingle
Via Illinois solo Peter Olson's blog, Solo In Chicago, I came across this post on fee agreement essentials which Olson extracted from an Illinois State Bar Association newsletter. Since my readers frequently ask about fee agreements, I was initially ex... [Read More]

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Chris Laughton

Michelle

A great New Year's resolution!

Is a simple tool to help with points 1 to 4 a note of the project scope as the front sheet of your working files? The concept is tailorable to electronic rather than paper files if necessary.

Chris

Michelle Golden

Hello Chris, yes, I think an overview of the engagement in a prominent and consistent place in the client's file is a wise approach.

Beyond that, though, I think conversation with the team to confirm facts (at the start of the engagement) and keeping doors of comm. open throughout so the customer's primary contact is always accessible in the event scope creep pops up.

Having a good change order form available and ready to go is essential. And doing a great job spelling out scope in the engagement letter plus setting the customer's expectations about what sort of common things that might arise but are outside of the scope are.

You might enjoy reading a recent post on the Verasage.com blog about a practitioner who, through his value pricing journey, is evolving his engagement scope descriptions to be more clear to clients about these things on the front end. From my experience, the things he cites in the email/blog post are the most common causes of scope creep for accountants. I find it is helpful to be open about all of this up front.

This post I refer to is quite long, but here is an excerpt of the part I'm referring to:

"This year we have set more specific parameters in our fixed price agreements, regarding the obligations, responsibilities and timing required of the client. As an example we now incorporate wording that results in a change order if we have to review more than two drafts of the filing; a change order if documents are not received when agreed on; a change order if we find management's assessment of internal control to be deficient; a change order if the opinion is qualified, or if there are undisclosed transactions, e.g. discontinued operations that they haven't accounted for properly."

The entire post is here: http://www.verasage.com/index.php/community/comments/faqs_about_change_orders_customer_profitablity_and_productivity

The comments to this entry are closed.

Read Michelle's Book

Subscribe

Become a Fan

Find Michelle Elsewhere


  • View Michelle Golden's profile on LinkedIn


  • Check out Golden Practices on Facebook

What VeraSage is Talking About

Other Stuff


  • Ranked by Power150

  • Legal Marketing Reader Top Blog

  • lawyer blogs

  • Alltop Accounting Blogs

  • Junta42 Top Content Marketing Blogs

Stats

Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 04/2005